Sunday, 15 May 2011

Interest, in silver

Guest Post by GM Jenkins

When we talk about the price of silver, we are of course talking about a ratio: how much the world values an ounce of silver compared to how much the world values a federal reserve note (FRN). Right now, the world's population values an American Eagle about 40 times more than it values a benny buck.

Other ratios might be more illuminating, however. For example, at any point in time, instead of swapping x FRNs for z ounces of silver, you can swap x FRNs for treasury notes and get x+y FRNs back in 10 yrs. What does the ratio of z/y look like?*




Note how well the lower two trend lines capture the movement of this ratio for the entirety of the decade's bull market ... until the center trend line was finally broken for good last August (see grey dots).

Note also that the ratio was a leading indicator: it started its steady ascent in April 2010, four months before the dollar price of silver did. In fact, only when the ratio broke through the center trend line did silver's August 2010 price explosion begin (see grey dots).

Note how the ratio tested the center trend line during "Turd's Bottom" in January 2011, and how previous resistance became support (whereas the center trend line had failed as support in 2008). That's when the ratio blasted past the upper trend line, only to come right back down to it, where it hovers today. Thus, this chart gives you information that the silver price chart doesn't: a clear demarcation of 2 phases of the silver bull market: the period from 2001 through Fall 2010, and everything afterwards.

Finally, note how tightly this ratio tracks the price of silver. It's doesn't have to do that (e.g. 2003 - 2004, or 2009 - 2010), and it's not intuitively obvious why it does when it does. Are we looking at the fingerprint of manipulation here? I'll have to think about this some more.

*Actually, stockcharts.com doesn't allow two ratios, i.e. z/y = z/x : y/x, so my chart depicts x/z : y/x (since x/z is just silver price, and $UST10Y a proxy for y/x). Similar idea. I'd like to see z/y if anyone can do that (i.e. ounces of silver per dollar divided by $UST10Y) .

Friday, 13 May 2011

When freezing in frost, peeing your pants keeps you warm a while..

...and then the inevitable happens. Much the same way as bailing out a bank only to find out they lied about how much they needed and there really is no means of saving them except to make every one else pay for it .... forever.
This is the version the Wall St. Journal did not want to publish.
Written by the leader of the "True Finn party".  I am bringing it to your attention because it is extremely well written and expresses the frustration in Europe by the common man.
It's the frustration of knowing there will be a train wreck whether you switch tracks or not. It's giving rise to Tea Party squared in Europe. The politicians are dubbing this sort of thinking "popularism" as a means of ridicule and dismissing their concerns and to try and put them in the same league as "The rent is too damn high party".  Dangerous mistake for the Bankers and Politicians. They did that with Hitler.

MAY 9, 2011
By TIMO SOINI

When I had the honor of leading the True Finn Party to electoral victory in April, we made a solemn promise to oppose the so-called bailouts of euro-zone member states. These bailouts are patently bad for Europe, bad for Finland and bad for the countries that have been forced to accept them. Europe is suffering from the economic gangrene of insolvency—both public and private. And unless we amputate that which cannot be saved, we risk poisoning the whole body.
The official wisdom is that Greece, Ireland and Portugal have been hit by a liquidity crisis, so they needed a momentary infusion of capital, after which everything would return to normal. But this official version is a lie, one that takes the ordinary people of Europe for idiots. They deserve better from politics and their leaders.
To understand the real nature and purpose of the bailouts, we first have to understand who really benefits from them. Let's follow the money.
At the risk of being accused of populism, we'll begin with the obvious: It is not the little guy that benefits. He is being milked and lied to in order to keep the insolvent system running. He is paid less and taxed more to provide the money needed to keep this Ponzi scheme going. Meanwhile, a kind of deadly symbiosis has developed between politicians and banks: Our political leaders borrow ever more money to pay off the banks, which return the favor by lending ever-more money back to our governments, keeping the scheme afloat.
In a true market economy, bad choices get penalized. Not here. When the inevitable failure of overindebted euro-zone countries came to light, a secret pact was made.
Instead of accepting losses on unsound investments—which would have led to the probable collapse and national bailout of some banks—it was decided to transfer the losses to taxpayers via loans, guarantees and opaque constructs such as the European Financial Stability Fund, Ireland's NAMA and a lineup of special-purpose vehicles that make Enron look simple. Some politicians understood this; others just panicked and did as they were told.
The money did not go to help indebted economies. It flowed through the European Central Bank and recipient states to the coffers of big banks and investment funds.
Further contrary to the official wisdom, the recipient states did not want such "help," not this way. The natural option for them was to admit insolvency and let failed private lenders, wherever they were based, eat their losses.
That was not to be. As former Finance Minister Brian Lenihan recently revealed, Ireland was forced to take the money. The same happened to Portuguese Prime Minister José Sócrates, although he may be less forthcoming than Mr. Lenihan about admitting it.


Why did the Brussels-Frankfurt extortion racket force these countries to accept the money along with "recovery" plans that would inevitably fail? Because they needed to please the tax-guzzling banks, which might otherwise refuse to turn up at the next Spanish, Belgian, Italian, or even French bond-auction.
Unfortunately for this financial and political cartel, their plan isn't working. Already under this scheme, Greece, Ireland and Portugal are ruined. They will never be able to save and grow fast enough to pay back the debts with which Brussels has saddled them in the name of saving them.
And so, unpurged, the gangrene spreads. The Spanish property sector is much bigger and more uncharted than that of Ireland. It is not just the cajas that are in trouble. There are major Spanish banks where what lies beneath the surface of the balance sheet may be a zombie, just as happened in Ireland for a while. The clock is ticking, and the problem is not going away.
Setting up the European Stability Mechanism is no solution. It would institutionalize the system of wealth transfers from private citizens to compromised politicians and otherwise failed bankers, creating a huge moral hazard and destroying what remains of Europe's competitive banking landscape.
Some defend the ESM, saying its use would always require unanimity. But the current mess with Portugal shows that the elite in Brussels will seek to enforce unanimity through pressure when it cannot be obtained by persuasion. Abolishing unanimity is only a matter of time. After that we have a full-fledged fiscal transfer union that is obviously in hock to Brussels' anti-growth corporatism.
Fortunately, it is not too late to stop the rot. For the banks, we need honest, serious stress tests. Stop the current politically inspired farce. Instead, have parallel assessments done by regulators and independent groups including stakeholders and academics. Trust, but verify.
Insolvent banks and financial institutions must be shut down, purging insolvency from the system. We must restore the market principle of freedom to fail.
If some banks are recapitalized with taxpayer money, taxpayers should get ownership stakes in return, and the entire board should be kicked out. But before any such taxpayer participation can be contemplated, it is essential to first apply big haircuts to bondholders.
For sovereign debt, the freedom to fail is again key. Significant restructuring is needed for genuine recovery. Yes, markets will punish defaulting states, but they are also quick to forgive. Current plans are destroying the real economies of Europe through elevated taxes and transfers of wealth from ordinary families to the coffers of insolvent states and banks. A restructuring that left a country's debt burden at a manageable level and encouraged a return to growth-oriented policies could lead to a swift return to international debt markets.
This is not just about economics. People feel betrayed. In Ireland, the incoming parties to the new government promised to hold senior bondholders responsible, but under pressure, they succumbed, leaving their voters with a sense of democratic disenfranchisement. The elites in Brussels have said that Finland must honor its commitments to its European partners, but Brussels is silent on whether national politicians should honor their commitments to their own voters. In a democracy, where we govern under the consent of the people, power is on loan. We do what we promise, even if it costs a dinner in Brussels, a "negative" media profile, or a seat in the cabinet.
When in Europe's long night of 1939-45, war came to Finland with the winter blizzards, my mother was one of eight siblings being raised on a small farm in central Finland where my grandparents eked out a frugal living. My two young uncles rushed to the front and were both wounded in action during Finland's chapter of Europe's most terrible bloodshed. I was raised to know that genocidal war must never again be visited on our continent and I came to understand the values and principles that originally motivated the establishment of what became the European Union.
This Europe, this vision, was one that offered the people of Finland and all of Europe the gift of peace founded on democracy, freedom, justice and subsidiarity. This is a Europe worth having, so it is with great distress that I see this project being put in jeopardy by a political elite who would sacrifice the interests of Europe's ordinary people in order to protect certain corporate interests.
Europe may still recover from this potentially terminal disease and decline. Insolvency must be purged from the system and it must be done openly and honestly. That path is not easy, but it is always the right path—for Finland, and for Europe.

Mr. Soini is the chairman of the True Finns Party in Finland





 

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Two new essays from Martin Armstrong

The first one is on the Silver Crash
http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/The%20Silver%20Crash%20of%202011%2005-06-2011.pdf

The Second one is "So you thought the Sovereign Debt crisis was over"
It hasn't been uploaded to the usual locations yet so I am going to do a little hunting for a freebie file hosting service and throw it up there.
Here it is:
http://FastFreeFileHosting.com/file/57075/So-you-thought-the-Sovereign-Debt-Crisis051111-pdf.html


Monday, 9 May 2011

PSLV premium may take a hit (update from original posted before Silver slam)





To anyone who bought PSLV on it's opening day congratulations you are smarter than the average bear. 
This is an FYI to anyone holding PSLV not a debate on whether the premium is simply true price discovery or a mini bubble.
Per Tom O' Brien Sprott is planning to dump some or all of his PSLV holdings. In  case you don't know who Tom is he is a self proclaimed Gold lover who has been calling a top for about a year or 10 in Gold. The video is here http://www.tfnn.com/hour01.html

Keep in mind this does not mean Sprott is getting out of Silver as he has plans to open a PSLV 2 in the future. However, depending on how he sells or the market reaction to this news the premium may take a hit. As always you have to do your own due diligence and if you are really concerned give PSLV a call.


Confirmed (sort of) From Zero HedgeSprott Silver Mutual fund

Friday, 6 May 2011

Martin Armstrong on Osama

Bart Chilton on Silver, oil etc May 6th 2011

These are brief excerpts from Bart Chilton, head of the CTFC,  interviewed on Squawk Box this morning. In most cases I am paraphrasing because I'm a horrible typist and brevity. He is talking about commodities in general and not necessarily just Silver.

"There is more going on than mere speculation"
"HFT traders are a problem. (Cheetah traders)"
"We need to make sure prices are based on fundamentals"
"Silver was up to $50 and is now around 35" We re going to be taking a look at this.
Speculative Dollars are coming in especially in Crude. 60% increase in Crude and 20% in metals
Speculation having an impact on the way up and down.
Very concerned about manipulation
These markets effect everyday life. Large influx of speculators.
You can't say last week these commodities are going up because of an easy money policy and then we crash this week on a bad jobless report.
Flash crash last May was from algorithmic trade.
Very concerned about speculation. It's our job to make sure markets are based on fundamentals.
BQ :CME hiked margin requirements. "Necessary move to remove some of the speculation and to protect against excessive speculation as some of the speculators may not have the money to back up their speculation.
Cascading effect on back to back margin hikes and I agree that it was necessary as some of the longs may not have had the money to pay if they are called upon.

I'll put up the video if I can locate it.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/42930592
Jobs report today: Expect some bullshit number followed by a revision.

Edit: Harvey Organ and others in the bug community consider Bart to be one of the good guys.  I personally think he is as well.

Personal Opinion:
We might be seeing some sentiment shift here. Only a blind man could look at the Silver chart right now and say; "Meh! it's perfectly normal". Even a blind man could see the current beat down is over done. People will be skittish and probably trade Monday and dump Friday until we reestablish the uptrend. Anyone looking at Oil has got to be thinking the same thing. 
CNBC etc crowing about the beat down just puts it on everyone's radar IMO. In other words talking about it is going to backfire. Silver is now considered cheap.
Those that were waiting have got be nibbling at this point. The recent sell off and loss of NAV in PSLV only makes it juicier once the whole story came out that Sprott didn't sell everything. Just a fraction of his holdings and only to recycle those dollars into the miners.


Wednesday, 4 May 2011

Silver corrections ... Just a little perspective

I snagged this from Casey research and as he points out the average correction is 19%
So if you were thinking of nibbling a little silver this might be a good starting point right here and now.
I will be doing a little nibbling tomorrow if I can find any good deals a little over spot through goldshark.com

Trend ain't our friend

Guest post by GM Jenkins

I've drawn a set of parallel trend lines on the 8 year log chart of silver, representing a growth rate of about 27% per year. The lines seem to capture silver's movement really well for the 5 years before it dropped off a cliff in 2008.

As I recently pointed out, silver's latest explosion (9/10 - 5/11) simply made up for the (manipulated?) events of Fall 2008, pulling silver back into its now extended exponential trend up.

That's the good news. The bad news is, silver touched the red dotted trend line in April 2004, April 2006, April 2008, and now in April 2011. Every time it has touched the red dotted trend line, it has fallen back down to the brown dotted trend-line before making its way back to the red.

Don't shoot the messenger, but if this pattern holds, we should probably expect silver to touch the blue/purple lines soon, and snake around the 30's for awhile...


*that is, unless the COMEX is about to default, SLV plummet to 0, and JPM go bankrupt, in which case none of this shit matters.





Make it stop and fair weather friends

My Mother always told me you can always tell who your real friends are when you need a favor. It works the other way as well. The guys who you thought were friends always seem to have their hands out when they need you and make you think you need them. My Mom is always right. Keep that in mind when taking advice from "friends" who find all sorts of errands to run when things are bad or who turn around and say "I never said that" even though you know they did.

Anyway, back to silver leaving aside all the fundamental reasons for holding silver and they have not changed take a look at Bill's charts below if you want to know where silver is going. We all make mistakes so it's time to man up and accept them as mistakes. My mistake was waiting too long to trade in some of that Silver for Gold. But I was willing to let it ride. I still am.

So you have a pile of Silver and you are asking yourself whether you should call Apmex or beat feet to the coin store.
Only two questions to ask yourself
Why did I buy it? and
What has changed besides the price?

Japan is still radioactive
The Dollar is still junk
Europe still has a debt crisis
The Middle East is still run by lunatics
Your home is still falling against any measure.
The White House is looking more retarded by the day and the politicians are still clueless shills for the banks.
and if you think the Osama boys are going to sit quietly then I have some Chinese made Antique coins to sell you.

So when does the pain end? Well take a look at Bills charts to get an idea. Massive support at $32 if we get that far. It would have been nice if Silver had run to $100 this month but it is not to be so we have to get back to reality now and be patient.

If guys like Sprott decided to sell a small portion of their physical and parlay it into shares then that sounds like a smart thing to do.

If guys like Jim Rogers say this; "They should have a rest. These commodities have been going straight up for several weeks, several months. It is good that they rest. Anything that goes straight up, usually goes straight down.

The things that have nice long term up-moves are the things that go up, consolidate, go up, consolidate, go up, consolidate. So, I hope that what we are seeing here is overdue normal correction in commodities and other things as well."

Then take heart the bull run is just getting started and remember these guys think on longer time lines than you or I and make their decisions on fundamentals not wishful thinking.  Fundamentally Silver is still a winner and these guys are betting millions not 20 or 30K.

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

Gold Mid Week Wednesday.

www.goldtrends.net

The longer term gold chart shows an important trend line hit this week near 1575 --- a pullback into Mid month has potential. Support is the 1478-1501 area and 1514-1524 going into Wednesday.

Silver Update Mid Week Wednesday

www.goldtrends.net

After hitting the 1998 projection line --- silver has dropped nine dollars to an important trend line. Look for support at the 37-41 area this week. (Ideal low would be 39.50-40.60)

SLV Database (Guest Post by Warren)



Time to test some claims again. Todays spotlight of scrutiny turns to SLV, the world’s largest stockpile of physical silver. For those of you looking for conspiracy, you will NOT find it here. What you will find, is analysis and questions of CLAIMS being made. The people running the trust CLAIM they have 366 million ounces of silver. Others CLAIM they don’t. Who is correct? And darn it, there’s money to be had depending on who is right or wrong.
Following GM Jenkins fine example of putting a chart to opinion, here is an anecdotal chart drawn from information available in the blogosphere. Note that each party has their own line of reasoning backing their stance (if I have unfairly presented anyone here, let me know):



First, why does it matter? Well first up – it’s a very big pile of silver. If the real silver is there as CLAIMED by the iShares Silver Trust, then most of the other stories we’ve been hearing don’t make sense. After all, it’s a simple case of whoever wants physical silver just buys a bunch of SLV shares and redeems them at spot price. No premium-laced cash settlements necessary. No 22% NAV premium required. No tightness of physical market. No delivery problems.
Now, I could write a book (or a very good action movie) about all the various counter claims – unless living under a rock then you are familiar with them already, and therefore I won’t discuss them in depth. Instead I want to focus on doing some hard concrete objective analysis. I also want to expose the methods for my research, to demonstrate that I’m not making any conjecture. Then I want to go to the extra step of making this accessible.
Here’s the gambit:

  1. SLV publish their bar serial numbers in a new PDF every week. Very transparent.
  2. There’s a lot of (public) information there, but it’s difficult to study because of the format.
  3. Let’s collate this information so that we can analyse it better (a relational database).
  4. Let’s put the database online and open it to the public so that anyone can access the info.
  5. Let’s graph this data and slice and dice it.

I’ll be working on the premise that good forgery is very difficult to do consistently – particularly with large amounts of data. I have no way of telling whether some interns have a full time job fabricating data records to make it look real – we can only look at the data presented to us and see if any anomalies exist.
I need to advise that some earlier studies have been done on the same. I currently am aware of at least two:

  1. The excellent weekly analysis of the Silver ETF bar numbers, here. We are very appreciative of the folk at http://About.Ag/ as they shared a bunch of data with us. You should check out their site for a very detailed and comprehensive analysis of all things related to silver.
  2. The Project Mayhem July 2009 investigation, who tried very hard to conjure a duplicates bogeyman, but has since been really well dissected by Bron Suchecki here.

Given that some analysis already exists out there, my strategy is slightly different and there are 4 phases to this project:

  1. (DONE) Construct a database and make it publicly accessible (using SQL Azure).
  2. Make a general call out there for all historical silver bar serial number files that people might have – both from SLV and other funds.
  3. Some kind of website component that people can put on their website to do an easy bar serial lookup (e.g. an investor could verify that a bar they received from SLV was actually held in their stock).
  4. Over time, with enough data it might be possible to cross-reference data from various funds and check for any multiple claims on the same metal.


The most important element of this is that it’s all independently verifiable. What is there is merely a copy of what was previously publicly available. If you have TSQL skills, or you can hire a data monkey who does then you can easily check and double check the claims that I make about the claims. There’s nothing to hide here, you can test everything yourself. If you don’t have access to your own data monkey then I can help (in exchange for some benny bucks).

  Database Server: erwzbgqjg0.database.windows.net
  Database Name: BullionBars
  User Name: slvreadonly
  Password: *12345screwtapefiles



If you have access to some OLD serial bar lists which you may have downloaded in the past and would like these to be added to the analysis data, please get in contact me at this blog, we would love to have a larger data picture.


If you have some ideas for some charts and graphs, requests changes and ideas: Submit Ideas Here

Disclaimer: I don’t accept any responsibility for the accuracy of the data however it is easily verifiable from visiting the source of the original documents (listed in the database). I may change the database schema and data at any time and I may revoke access to the public login if I desire. Making the database public is NOT an acceptance that the SLV bars are real. Do not make any trades based on the information I present, however please feel free to use the information as part of your own due diligence.

Currently I have loaded data from mid-March 2011 to present, with more historical data to come (I am in possession of files from July 2010 onwards). I’ve done a little bit of analysis so far. Here is a quick profile of bar weight distribution. Dead boring – there is nothing to see here except that the shape is pretty close to what you would expect and is the classic distribution of bar size.



Then something more interesting, here is a chart of inventory by ‘country of origin’ for the refiner who produced the bars. This graph goes not currently show movement in-and-out (or movement over time), but one thing is clear – it has lots of silver from Russia and China. Again this only proves that SLV claims to have lots of silver which originates from refiners in Russia and China. Someone might be able to call the significance on that – I don’t have enough knowledge to make a judgement. Note these don’t necessary represent new bars being made, just a representation of what SLV claims to hold @ April 27.



Wading through all the data has been quite an exercise – there are a lot of records. On the surface it looks quite real to me, and the idea about JPM being long physical silver looks real when you stop to think about it. Personally we have to come up with a better theory … for example let’s say they do have the silver but can’t release it because it forms the collateral for all their leveraged paper trading then that also makes sense of what we’re seeing, and the real value for that underlying silver is worth more to them, than an 80% premium, i.e. perhaps everyone is right but for the wrong reasons. The key to this whole thing appears to be ‘derivatives’ and I’m trying to find the right interpretation of it. Discussion is encouraged and I’ll be adding extra dimensions to my analysis and database over time, but I would really welcome some notes from Amber/Wynter_Benton if you’re out there. And Kid Dynamite, just so you know – my database does not PROVE the silver is there – it simply makes the existing CLAIMS more accessible for analysis (to everyone). Paul D. Bain, I’m interested in some of your theories too if you had a comment (you owe me one).